03 / Submission desk

Residency applications: make the project legible.

A strong application is specific, complete and easy to assess. It connects your practice to the program without pretending the project is already finished.

Artist notebook with proposal notes and image references

Start with eligibility

Read the current application page before drafting. Check discipline, career-stage language, nationality or location rules, dates, language requirements, file limits and any nomination process. Requirements vary by program. If a rule is unclear, use the published contact route rather than guessing.

Write the artist statement

The statement explains how you work. Keep it distinct from a project proposal. Name recurring questions, materials, methods and contexts. Avoid a complete biography. Use concrete verbs. A reader should understand what you make, what informs it and what is changing now.

Build the project proposal

The proposal describes what you intend to investigate during the residency. Include the starting point, method, practical needs and likely direction. Do not overpromise a finished result when the purpose is research. Explain why this particular time, place or facility matters.

Good proposals show flexibility. State what is fixed and what may change after research. Include a simple sequence: first actions, middle tests and an end-of-stay position. If a public outcome is required, separate it from the private research process.

Select work samples

Choose evidence that supports the proposal. A smaller, coherent selection is easier to read than a complete archive. Label each work with title, year, medium, dimensions or duration. Check whether links require passwords and whether videos open on common devices.

Use the CV as a map

List education, exhibitions, commissions, publications, residencies, awards and relevant employment only where useful. Dates should be consistent. Keep the structure scannable. A short CV is not a weakness if it clearly shows the development of your practice.

References and supporting material

Ask referees early. Give them the program description, your proposal and the submission date. Confirm whether letters are uploaded by you or sent directly. Add only supporting material requested or genuinely useful. Extra files can obscure the main argument.

Build a deadline system

Record the official closing time and time zone. Create earlier internal dates for research, first draft, review, file export and final upload. Keep a versioned folder. Open every exported PDF. Test every link. Save proof of submission if the system provides it.

Good for

This process suits open calls, exchange applications, hosted studios and research placements. It also helps when a program has a short form but expects a precise project description.

Check before applying

  • Does the proposal answer the stated question?
  • Are all files in the requested format and size?
  • Do images show the work at useful scale?
  • Are names, dates and contact details consistent?
  • Have you confirmed current dates before applying?

Common submission problems

Frequent failures include unreadable PDFs, missing captions, broken video links, unsupported characters, late uploads and proposals that describe a broad ambition without a workable next step. Use a final checklist made from the exact form fields.

Related files

Review program models · Plan financial needs · Choose a format

Need an application checklist?

Send your questions about structure, evidence or planning.

Contact the guide